politicsparty.com
WORLD'S BEST ANALYSIS
sidredbuzz@gmail.com
TITLE OF COLUMN
"COURT MUST DISMISS AKBAR DEFAMATION CASE AGAINST METOO HEART-CRY OF PRIYA RAMANI"
 
 
PRIYADARSHINI SIDDHARTHA REDDY
CHAIRMAN
BOARD OF EDITORS
 
  COURT MUST DISMISS AKBAR DEFAMATION CASE AGAINST METOO HEART-CRY OF PRIYA RAMANI  
 
Home Archive Print

COURT MUST DISMISS AKBAR DEFAMATION CASE AGAINST METOO
ANY WOMAN’S “HEART-CRY” MUST NOT BE DESIGNATED AS DEFAMATION
AKBAR MUST WITHDRAW DEFAMATION CASE AGAINST PRIYA RAMANI
Sample 1
IT IS JUDICIAL COMMONSENSE, TO NOT PUNISH HEART-CRY OF WOMEN

 By: PRIYADARSHINI SIDDHARTHA REDDY
 
 CHAIRMAN BOARD OF EDITORS
 politicsparty.com
 sidredbuzz@gmail.com
 18 October 2018
 

AKBAR MUST WITHDRAW DEFAMATION CASE


M.J.Akbar will be demonstrating Commonsense and wisdom, ONLY by withdrawing the Defamation Case against the ME-TOO Journalist Priya Ramani.


politicsparty.com  Appeals to M.J.Akbar to be sensible NOW, by withdrawing his Defamation Case against ME-TOO Priya Ramani, who poured out her HEART-CRY at her being sexploited by publicly narrating her painful sexperience.


DISMISS AKBAR DEFAMATION CASE AGAINST PRIYA RAMANI


Priya Ramani must NOT be subjected to Judicial Pain, after being subjected to the painful sexperience.


The M.J.Akbar Defamation Case, against the ME-TOO Journalist Priya Ramani, on the allegations of the sexual misconduct, must be dismissed by the Court of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Samar Vishal, in its hearing in the Patiala Court House at New Delhi on Thursday the 18th of October 2018.


NO WOMAN WILL HAVE COURAGE TO EXPOSE MISCONDUCT


No woman will have the courage in the future to make public her pain of sexploitation by any Male Boss, IF the Court allows the Defamation Case against Priya Ramani.


The Court must NOT allow the Defamation case to become the instrument to SILENCE the voices of the sexploited at-the-workplace Women.


The Court must sympathise with all the women who are sexploited in the course of their duties in the Male’s Office.


The Court will be Judicially Correct, ONLY if the Court dismisses the Defamation Case against Priya Ramani.


DEFAMATION, ONLY IF ALLEGE ABOUT ANOTHER WOMAN & NOT HERSELF


It could be construed as DEFAMATION Only If the ME-TOO Journalist Priya Ramani had accused M.J.Akbar of sexual misconduct with some other woman.


It could then be said that, Priya Ramani was probably making the sexploitation allegation, about the sexperience of another woman, without any visual proof and hence must be put through the Defamation Case Trial.


HEART-CRY IS NOT DEFAMATION


HEART-CRY of any woman must not designated as Defamation.


The HEART-CRY of any woman, must NOT be construed as DEFAMATION.


The ME-TOO Journalist Priya Ramani has painfully poured out her heart publicly on the sexperience imposed on her by M.J.Akbar.


The HEART-CRY of Priya Ramani must NOT be designated as an act of Defamation.


PRIYA RAMANI SEEKING SOLACE


Priya Ramani HEART-CRY is seeking Justice, Solace and Sympathy from the Society, for her agony and her shame subjected on her, just because she was a woman, working in a Man’s Office.


Priya Ramani must NOT be punished for her HEART-CRY, by imposing the Defamation Case against her.


PRIYA SERVING SEXPLOITABLE WOMEN


Priya Ramani by publicly narrating her horror story is serving the womens’ society.


Priya Ramani with her HEART-CRY, is alerting all the other sexploitable women, who can be sexexploited in the workplaces, to not to succumb to sexperiences imposed by sex-itchy pervert Bosses.


NO WOMAN WILL SHAME HERSELF

No ordinary woman will shame herself in public by narrating her sexperience caused due to the sexploitation by her male boss.


A woman must be very courageous to narrate her sexperience suffered due to her male boss.


A woman has to risk losing her stature at home and her status in the society by being courageous in narrating her horrible sexperience.


Priya Ramani would NOT have publicly stated her sexperience, if she had NOT been exploited by her male boss.  


DEFAMATION ONLY IF SEXPLOIT NEVER HAPPENED


M.J.Akbar can file Defamation, ONLY if Priya Ramani has lied.


There can Never be witnesses for any sexploitation in any Male’s Office, to prove that the sexperience incident happened or did not happen.


HIS WORD VS HER WORD


It is M.J.Akbar’s “I did Not sexploit” sentence against the Priya Ramani sentence “I was sexploited”.


So, it must be construed that Priya Ramani is not publicly shaming herself, just to harm M.J.Akbar.


JUDICIAL COMMONSENSE FOR SEXPLOITED WOMEN


There is immediate NEED of Judicial Commonsense in preventing sexploited women of being subjected to Defamation Cases, just because the sexploited woman has articulated her sexperience.


It is Judicial Commonsense that instead of allowing to accuse Priya Ramani of Defamation, the humane Justice must be to be sympathetic with the Heart-Cry of Priya Ramani, the sexploited at the workplace, Journalist.


COURT MUST NOT ALLOW DEFAMATION CASE


The Court must NOT allow the Defamation Case against Priya Ramani.


The Court must dismiss the Defamation Case against Priya Ramani.


FINISHLINE


The M.J.Akbar Defamation Case against the ME-TOO Journalist Priya Ramani on her allegations of sexual misconduct, must be dismissed by the Court of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Samar Vishal, in its hearing in the Patiala Court House at New Delhi, on Thursday the 18th of October 2018.
 
 By: PRIYADARSHINI SIDDHARTHA REDDY
 
 CHAIRMAN BOARD OF EDITORS
 sidredbuzz@gmail.com
 politicsparty.com
 
( Send Comments to sidredbuzz@gmail.com )
FOLLOW US  
 
 Copyright © politicsparty.com

©All Rights Reserved. Copies of content on www.politicsparty.com must not be duplicated for commercial purposes.For Permission to Reproduce Content, Contact Chairman, Board of Editors, www.politicsparty.com at sidredbuzz@gmail.com. Any Queries or Dialogue related to Content must be addressed to sidredbuzz@gmail.com